Lukas Hellum Lilleengen vs Guelfo Baldovinetti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Lilleengen has been winning 40.54% of points on his second serve in the last six months, slightly lower than Baldovinetti’s 42.19%. Could this minor edge in serving indicate Baldovinetti’s advantage?
• Return Game Stats: Lilleengen has won 44.39% of second serve return points, while Baldovinetti has a marginally higher stat of 45.2%. In first serve returns, Lilleengen trails with 29.33% compared to Baldovinetti's 30.94%.
• Handling Pressure: Lilleengen has a better breakpoint saving rate of 54.88%, compared to Baldovinetti’s 48.15%. Could Lilleengen’s ability under pressure swing the match in his favor?
• Overall Performance: Over the past year, Lilleengen has a win rate of 46.67%, while Baldovinetti’s is slightly superior at 51.43%.
• Best Surface: Both players excel on Clay. Lilleengen wins 53% of such matches, whereas Baldovinetti achieves 44% wins on the same surface.
• Player Level: Lilleengen and Baldovinetti have primarily competed in $10K level Futures/ITF events, where Baldovinetti holds a higher win percentage of 52.94% compared to Lilleengen's 46.67%.
• Quality of Opponents: Baldovinetti has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 102.29, while Lilleengen’s opponents have an average rank of 163.97. Does facing stronger opponents better prepare Baldovinetti for this match?
• Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets, Lilleengen has a low win rate of 25%, whereas Baldovinetti excels with a 71% success rate, indicating a potential advantage in a tight match.
• Break Point Conversion: Baldovinetti has converted 43.14% of break point opportunities, significantly higher than Lilleengen's 25.86% conversion rate, suggesting an edge in crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):

This match sets up an interesting showdown with varied strengths and weaknesses for both players. Lilleengen's ability to rescue breakpoints highlights his capacity under pressure, yet Baldovinetti edges him out in serve and return game efficiency.

Interestingly, both players see their best success on Clay courts, although Lilleengen has slightly better historical results there. Baldovinetti, however, has faced more formidable opponents over the past year, which might lend him more match experience at higher competition levels.

With Baldovinetti's higher breakpoint conversion rate and superior success in deciding sets, he seems to have the knack for performing when it counts. These factors, coupled with his current form and history of facing tougher competitors, lead to the anticipation that Baldovinetti is more likely to win this upcoming tennis match.